Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
TITLE
Side Effects of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation: Types, Frequency, Discomfort and Course
A Third Report Mild Reactions
SOURCE
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8725094/
REFERENCE
13
NICE
REFERENCE
123
organisation
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
TITLE
Side Effects of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation: Types, Frequency, Discomfort and Course
A Third Report Mild Reactions
SOURCE
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8725094/
DISC COMMENTARY
This Norwegian prospective cohort study followed patients having chiropractic treatment to record how often they experienced short-term side effects, what kind of reactions occurred, and how long these typically lasted, drawing on records collected directly from patients across a course of care.
What was studied?
The study tracked patients through a course of chiropractic treatment, recording the proportion who experienced any side effect, the type of reaction, when it began relative to treatment, and how long it took to resolve.
What did they find?
Around a third of patients experienced some side effect, with about 23% reporting local or radiating discomfort. Most reactions were mild to moderate rather than severe, started on the day of treatment, and had resolved within 24 hours.
Why it matters
Knowing that most reactions after manual treatment are mild and short-lived helps set realistic expectations for anyone starting care. It also draws a useful line between these common reactions and rarer, more serious events.
Why we included it
It illustrates a wider principle in safety communication: distinguishing common, minor reactions from rare, serious ones helps patients form realistic expectations rather than being caught off guard.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You can choose which categories to allow below. Cookies categorised as Necessary are always active.
We also use third-party cookies for analytics and advertising. These are only stored with your consent. You can update or withdraw consent at any time via the cookie icon at the bottom-left. This site operates under UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). Cookie Policy • Privacy Policy
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required for core site features including security, network management, and consent storage.
Cookie
Duration
Description
hmdg_cookie_consent
180 days
Stores your cookie consent preferences.
PHPSESSID
Session
WordPress session identifier.
wordpress_logged_in_*
Session
WordPress login authentication.
Functional cookies enable enhanced features such as live chat and remembering preferences.
Cookie
Duration
Description
wp-settings-*
1 year
Stores user interface preferences.
Analytics cookies help us understand visitor behaviour. Controls analytics_storage for Google Analytics 4.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_ga
2 years
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_ga_*
2 years
Google Analytics 4 — session persistence.
_gid
24 hours
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_gat
1 minute
Google Analytics — throttles request rate.
Performance cookies collect aggregate, anonymous data about site performance.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_gat_gtag_*
1 minute
Google Tag Manager — rate throttle.
Marketing cookies track visits to deliver relevant ads. Controls ad_storage, ad_user_data, and ad_personalization.
What was studied?
The study tracked patients through a course of chiropractic treatment, recording the proportion who experienced any side effect, the type of reaction, when it began relative to treatment, and how long it took to resolve.
What did they find?
Around a third of patients experienced some side effect, with about 23% reporting local or radiating discomfort. Most reactions were mild to moderate rather than severe, started on the day of treatment, and had resolved within 24 hours.
Why it matters
Knowing that most reactions after manual treatment are mild and short-lived helps set realistic expectations for anyone starting care. It also draws a useful line between these common reactions and rarer, more serious events.
Why we included it
It illustrates a wider principle in safety communication: distinguishing common, minor reactions from rare, serious ones helps patients form realistic expectations rather than being caught off guard.