Feasibility of a Promising Pulsed Electrostimulator for Rapid Motor Recovery of Foot Drop
Single Case, 3-Month Follow-Up
SOURCE
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38327404/
REFERENCE
49
NICE
REFERENCE
123
organisation
Heliyon
TITLE
Feasibility of a Promising Pulsed Electrostimulator for Rapid Motor Recovery of Foot Drop
Single Case, 3-Month Follow-Up
SOURCE
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38327404/
DISC COMMENTARY
This single case report describes one patient’s recovery from foot drop, an inability to lift the front of the foot caused by nerve damage, following nerve injury during surgery. It documents ankle movement recovery over three months of pulsed electrostimulation treatment.
What was studied?
The report tracks a 55-year-old woman with foot drop after nerve injury during surgery, who had very limited ankle movement three months post-injury. She received pulsed electrostimulation three times weekly for three months.
What did they find?
Her ankle movement recovered from 0-5 degrees to 0-27 degrees, close to her unaffected side's normal range of roughly 0-30 degrees. Most improvement occurred in the second and third months, comparing favourably with previously published surgical cases.
Why it matters
As a single case, this result cannot be generalised the way a larger controlled trial's findings could. It is best read as a promising early signal for this technology, not proof of typical results.
Why we included it
It shows why DISC treats early case evidence as a signal worth watching rather than settled proof, useful for flagging promising technology while waiting for larger trials to confirm how well it generalises.
Help us improve your experience (and hopefully your back).
We use cookies to improve the website and show relevant content to people interested in our services.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You can choose which categories to allow below. Cookies categorised as Necessary are always active.
We also use third-party cookies for analytics and advertising. These are only stored with your consent. You can update or withdraw consent at any time via the cookie icon at the bottom-left. This site operates under UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). Cookie Policy • Privacy Policy
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required for core site features including security, network management, and consent storage.
Cookie
Duration
Description
hmdg_cookie_consent
180 days
Stores your cookie consent preferences.
PHPSESSID
Session
WordPress session identifier.
wordpress_logged_in_*
Session
WordPress login authentication.
Functional cookies enable enhanced features such as live chat and remembering preferences.
Cookie
Duration
Description
wp-settings-*
1 year
Stores user interface preferences.
Analytics cookies help us understand visitor behaviour. Controls analytics_storage for Google Analytics 4.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_ga
2 years
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_ga_*
2 years
Google Analytics 4 — session persistence.
_gid
24 hours
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_gat
1 minute
Google Analytics — throttles request rate.
Performance cookies collect aggregate, anonymous data about site performance.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_gat_gtag_*
1 minute
Google Tag Manager — rate throttle.
Marketing cookies track visits to deliver relevant ads. Controls ad_storage, ad_user_data, and ad_personalization.
What was studied?
The report tracks a 55-year-old woman with foot drop after nerve injury during surgery, who had very limited ankle movement three months post-injury. She received pulsed electrostimulation three times weekly for three months.
What did they find?
Her ankle movement recovered from 0-5 degrees to 0-27 degrees, close to her unaffected side's normal range of roughly 0-30 degrees. Most improvement occurred in the second and third months, comparing favourably with previously published surgical cases.
Why it matters
As a single case, this result cannot be generalised the way a larger controlled trial's findings could. It is best read as a promising early signal for this technology, not proof of typical results.
Why we included it
It shows why DISC treats early case evidence as a signal worth watching rather than settled proof, useful for flagging promising technology while waiting for larger trials to confirm how well it generalises.