Efficacy and Safety of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
55 Trials, 3,750 Patients
SOURCE
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/4/e053468
REFERENCE
123
NICE
REFERENCE
123
organisation
BMJ Open
TITLE
Efficacy and Safety of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
55 Trials, 3,750 Patients
SOURCE
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/4/e053468
DISC COMMENTARY
This overview combined nine systematic reviews and meta-analyses, covering 55 trials and nearly 3,750 patients, to assess how effective and safe osteopathic manipulative treatment is across a range of conditions, alongside the quality of the underlying reviews themselves.
What was studied?
The review compared osteopathic manipulative treatment against control treatments for musculoskeletal conditions such as back and neck pain, alongside non-musculoskeletal uses including paediatric conditions, headache disorders and irritable bowel syndrome.
What did they find?
For musculoskeletal pain conditions, osteopathic treatment outperformed comparison treatments for reducing pain and improving function. Evidence was much weaker for paediatric conditions, headache and irritable bowel syndrome. Most reviews reported no adverse events, but review quality overall was rated low.
Why it matters
Osteopathic manipulation's strongest evidence lies in musculoskeletal pain conditions like back and neck pain, the same area where chiropractic evidence is also strongest, and is far weaker for non-musculoskeletal uses.
Why we included it
It shows a pattern that holds across manual therapy professions generally: the strongest evidence clusters around musculoskeletal pain, not digestive or paediatric conditions, where claims still outrun the evidence.
Help us improve your experience (and hopefully your back).
We use cookies to improve the website and show relevant content to people interested in our services.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You can choose which categories to allow below. Cookies categorised as Necessary are always active.
We also use third-party cookies for analytics and advertising. These are only stored with your consent. You can update or withdraw consent at any time via the cookie icon at the bottom-left. This site operates under UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). Cookie Policy • Privacy Policy
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required for core site features including security, network management, and consent storage.
Cookie
Duration
Description
hmdg_cookie_consent
180 days
Stores your cookie consent preferences.
PHPSESSID
Session
WordPress session identifier.
wordpress_logged_in_*
Session
WordPress login authentication.
Functional cookies enable enhanced features such as live chat and remembering preferences.
Cookie
Duration
Description
wp-settings-*
1 year
Stores user interface preferences.
Analytics cookies help us understand visitor behaviour. Controls analytics_storage for Google Analytics 4.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_ga
2 years
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_ga_*
2 years
Google Analytics 4 — session persistence.
_gid
24 hours
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_gat
1 minute
Google Analytics — throttles request rate.
Performance cookies collect aggregate, anonymous data about site performance.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_gat_gtag_*
1 minute
Google Tag Manager — rate throttle.
Marketing cookies track visits to deliver relevant ads. Controls ad_storage, ad_user_data, and ad_personalization.
What was studied?
The review compared osteopathic manipulative treatment against control treatments for musculoskeletal conditions such as back and neck pain, alongside non-musculoskeletal uses including paediatric conditions, headache disorders and irritable bowel syndrome.
What did they find?
For musculoskeletal pain conditions, osteopathic treatment outperformed comparison treatments for reducing pain and improving function. Evidence was much weaker for paediatric conditions, headache and irritable bowel syndrome. Most reviews reported no adverse events, but review quality overall was rated low.
Why it matters
Osteopathic manipulation's strongest evidence lies in musculoskeletal pain conditions like back and neck pain, the same area where chiropractic evidence is also strongest, and is far weaker for non-musculoskeletal uses.
Why we included it
It shows a pattern that holds across manual therapy professions generally: the strongest evidence clusters around musculoskeletal pain, not digestive or paediatric conditions, where claims still outrun the evidence.