Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
TITLE
Chiropractic Treatment of Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
6 Studies, All Positive Results
SOURCE
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18722200/
REFERENCE
106
NICE
REFERENCE
123
organisation
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
TITLE
Chiropractic Treatment of Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
6 Studies, All Positive Results
SOURCE
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18722200/
DISC COMMENTARY
This systematic review searched research published between 1982 and 2007 on chiropractic care for pregnancy-related low back pain. It identified and assessed the quality of available studies, summarising what the evidence shows about this treatment for this specific patient population.
What was studied?
The review identified six studies meeting its inclusion criteria: one quasi-experimental study, four case series, and one cross-sectional study. None used randomisation or a control group, and quality scores ranged from 5 to 14 out of a possible 27 points.
What did they find?
All six included studies reported positive results for chiropractic care of pregnancy-related low back pain. The review stopped short of claiming proof of effectiveness, noting inconsistent outcome measures, but described the early results as consistently encouraging and worth pursuing further.
Why it matters
For pregnant women with low back pain, this signals that early evidence for chiropractic care is consistently positive, though not yet backed by high-quality trials.
Why we included it
It shows why early, encouraging evidence should be presented honestly rather than oversold: a consistently positive track record still needs stronger trials before it becomes a confident claim.
Help us improve your experience (and hopefully your back).
We use cookies to improve the website and show relevant content to people interested in our services.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You can choose which categories to allow below. Cookies categorised as Necessary are always active.
We also use third-party cookies for analytics and advertising. These are only stored with your consent. You can update or withdraw consent at any time via the cookie icon at the bottom-left. This site operates under UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). Cookie Policy • Privacy Policy
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required for core site features including security, network management, and consent storage.
Cookie
Duration
Description
hmdg_cookie_consent
180 days
Stores your cookie consent preferences.
PHPSESSID
Session
WordPress session identifier.
wordpress_logged_in_*
Session
WordPress login authentication.
Functional cookies enable enhanced features such as live chat and remembering preferences.
Cookie
Duration
Description
wp-settings-*
1 year
Stores user interface preferences.
Analytics cookies help us understand visitor behaviour. Controls analytics_storage for Google Analytics 4.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_ga
2 years
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_ga_*
2 years
Google Analytics 4 — session persistence.
_gid
24 hours
Google Analytics — distinguishes users.
_gat
1 minute
Google Analytics — throttles request rate.
Performance cookies collect aggregate, anonymous data about site performance.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_gat_gtag_*
1 minute
Google Tag Manager — rate throttle.
Marketing cookies track visits to deliver relevant ads. Controls ad_storage, ad_user_data, and ad_personalization.
What was studied?
The review identified six studies meeting its inclusion criteria: one quasi-experimental study, four case series, and one cross-sectional study. None used randomisation or a control group, and quality scores ranged from 5 to 14 out of a possible 27 points.
What did they find?
All six included studies reported positive results for chiropractic care of pregnancy-related low back pain. The review stopped short of claiming proof of effectiveness, noting inconsistent outcome measures, but described the early results as consistently encouraging and worth pursuing further.
Why it matters
For pregnant women with low back pain, this signals that early evidence for chiropractic care is consistently positive, though not yet backed by high-quality trials.
Why we included it
It shows why early, encouraging evidence should be presented honestly rather than oversold: a consistently positive track record still needs stronger trials before it becomes a confident claim.